Tag Archive | "Braunstein/Quay Gallery"

Jane Rosen @ Braunstein/Quay

Tags: , ,

Jane Rosen @ Braunstein/Quay


Inside Rosen’s San Gregorio studio

Jane Rosen, at the beginning of her career, found herself in the thick of the New York art scene. It was the era when Minimalism ruled, and her early work reflected it. Then one day, she took herself up to the Art Students League and began to study Renaissance drawing technique with Robert Beverly Hale, curator of drawing at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. 

Her move was a sign of what artists are often thought to possess, a spirit of independent inquiry. Rosen graduated from NYU with straight A’s in her dual major, art and philosophy. In those days the phrase “art, philosophy and religion” hadn’t quite disappeared from familiar usage. The big questions, which remain with us today in spite of the amazing proliferation of distractions, were not off limits. 

In 1988 she was introduced to stone carving through an American Foundation Award that took her to Portugal.  Ten years later she began a relationship with glass as an artist in residence at Pilchuck Glass School.  Over the years, she’s also taught: at the School of Visual Arts in New York, UC Davis, Stanford, Bard and UC Berkeley. Recently, her work was included in the Academy of Arts and Letters Invitational Exhibition in New York, as well as in solo shows at Sears-Peyton and in galleries in a number of other cities, including Braunstein/Quay in San Francisco where her work is currently on display through May 7. 
 
"Pale Male," 2011, hand blown pigmented glass and limestone 70.5 x 10 x 20”
But something happened that took her away from the kind of success she might have found if she’d pursued her fast start in Manhattan.  She visited the Bay Area where she rented a place on a horse ranch south of Half Moon Bay for six months. The exposure to the beauty of the place—the coast, the hills, the redwoods—made a deep impression. One day, as she stepped out of her house, she looked up and saw a red-tailed hawk soaring above her. “As I stood looking up at the hawk, in a voice as clear as day, I heard these words, ‘Tell my story’.”
 
If, growing up on Long Island, Rosen had appreciated nature in an unself-conscious way, then her experiences in California focused her nascent interest in a new and compelling way.  What is it that nature has to show us if we have the eyes to see it? And what is seeing, anyway?  These are questions Rosen has explored for a long time.  Are we really beyond them now?  I can imagine Jane laughing at this and saying, “Remember, we still have bodies.”
 
Often in her work one senses a quality of presence.  It’s no accident.  Perhaps something of the intelligence of the body is made visible, an intelligence that also functions in us, but which is mostly buried under the noise and bustle of daily life. And there’s another stratum quietly present in many of Rosen’s pieces, an unsentimental quality of feeling, and a grace—both in the smooth-surfaced glass figures and in the rough-hewn stone figures.
 
“Rough Hawk”, 2007-11, mixed media, 24 x 24 x 1 ½“
Rosen’s drawings provide another way of making visible what she sees in the animals she watches so closely: the jays, hawks, woodpeckers, ravens, quail, squirrels, hummingbirds, coyotes, foxes, deer, and other animals that are part of her daily life, including her dogs and two horses.  Her drawing of a horse, Ground Tie, is a strong example of this.  It conveys something about inhabiting the body and speaks to the feelings, too.  What Rosen is trying to show is not easily put in words. Her drawing, Herd Dogs Herding, is a great example of this.  Its hint of something almost ecstatic, and an aura I’m tempted to call religious, is quite surprising.
 
Rosen is happy to talk about her synesthesia. “I hear shapes,” she explains, and further, “I can see with my hands.”  I’ve never really grasped how that works, but her art somehow seems to speak directly to our instinctive life.  Her stone hawk Fossil Bird has its own magical story.  As the limestone was being worked, a large piece broke off, a fossil shell, leaving a perfect curve in the hawk’s folded wing.  Later Rosen’s stone vendor was looking at the piece. “Where did you get this stone,” he asked. “From you!” Rosen replied. “But it’s illegal to ship this kind of stone out of France!” he said.  Apparently it had been sold to Rosen by accident.  The fossil shell that emerged mysteriously from the stone sits in front of the piece and adds another layer of meaning that’s a pure gift.
–RICHARD WHITTAKER
 
Jane Rosen: “Wild Life” @ Braunstein/Quay Gallery through May 7, 2011.
 
Cover image: Herd Dogs Herding, 2010, Korean watercolor on Japanese paper, 16 x 28"
 
About the author
Richard Whittaker is the founding editor of works & conversations and West Coast editor of Parabola magazine.

 

 
 

 

 

Posted in ProfilesComments (0)

Artist Profile: Robert Brady

Tags: , ,

Artist Profile: Robert Brady


Studio view  — Photo: Lee Fatheree

I had been looking at Bob Brady’s art for nearly 20 years, but it wasn’t until I saw an exhibit last spring of more than 50 sculptures and drawings at Oats Park Art Center in Fallon, Nevada that I really understood, in a very literal sense, where his work was coming from.  I knew a few things about the artist’s background: his hardscrabble upbringing in Reno, the illness that temporarily debilitated him as a teenager, and how he rejected Funk for a more lyrical mode of expression while earning his MFA degree at UC Davis.  But it wasn’t until I drove through the high desert – to Fallon – that I really “got” how the local environment shaped his art.

At the show’s opening I saw a lot of working people — salt-of-the-Earth types in coveralls, boots, cowboy hats and checked shirts, staring hard at the imaginary hand tools that Brady had fabricated out of wood.  They seemed to understand these objects intuitively, as if Brady’s well-crafted fictions (involving a spinning wheel, a sailor’s tool and other implements to which he attaches great spiritual significance) were, somehow, in their unnatural gallery setting, natural extensions of their everyday lives.  I also saw in Brady’s sculpture and drawings echoes of everything I had witnessed en route to Fallon: snow-capped peaks, roadside mills and mines, sagebrush-swept farms, warnings about secret military installations, trailer parks, and all the neon signs that light up Nevada’s main drags, advertising everything from casinos to beauty parlors.  I also sensed how the UFO lore that persists throughout this region helped spawn the cosmic elements that appear in many of his drawings and in more than a few of his 3-D works. 

"Natomas", 2009, mixed media, 75 x 17 x 13 inches

From the beginning of his 35-year career, Brady, 64, has had a knack for scavenging and creatively re-purposing objects, ideas and experiences.  Whether scouring the desert outside Reno for remnants of broken tools and fragments of glass, reading about tribal art, traveling to foreign countries or sifting through the detritus of his Berkeley studio, Brady has always employed an archeologist’s instinct to help guide his explorations.  He integrates his “finds” into sculptures and drawings that align with his ancient/tribal look — a singular and immediately identifiable aesthetic that has remained consistent over decades, yet pliable enough to absorb continuous embellishment and extrapolation.  This mutability within a signature style has allowed him to keep his work fresh without having to periodically reinvent himself.  

“The figure,” he states, “is the anchor, but I imagine many possibilities in regard to form. I am endlessly interested in the dynamics of line, mass, planes, distortion – setting up dialogues and battles within the piece.” What remains constant in Brady’s career is a relentless desire to expand the vocabulary of wood, his primary medium since 1989, the year he quit ceramic sculpture so that he could build large-scale forms more easily and more fluidly — without the stop-start cycles necessitated by clay and the defects that, through no fault of the artist, can occur in the firing process.

His best-known works, many of which were displayed here, are rough-hewn, long-limbed, figures that appear at life-size and in anatomically challenging poses.  Sitting, standing, kneeling, and sometimes folded into fetal positions, both freestanding and wall-mounted, his sculptures articulate a geometry text’s worth of angles, forms and negative spaces.  They mix delicateness and toughness in roughly equal measure, and employ surfaces that are gouged, abraded, painted and sanded.  Some are so lithe that air currents move limbs around the axis of the pins that hold them in place; while others, like Lepus, in which the star-painted carapace of a wooden fish draped atop a pole, feels epic, like a wedding of sea and sky.

"Patriarch", 1999, mixed media, 77 x 22 x 33 inches

Among the most memorable, if not the most mysterious pieces in this show, are the three, seven-foot-tall figures of the Natomas series.  They are so slight that they appear to be constructed of distressed pool cues; they stand in formation like a phalanx of mute soldiers, greeting visitors without exactly welcoming them.  Like the works of Stephen de Staebler and Alberto Giacometti, two key influences, Brady’s attenuated, mostly androgynous sculptures project the artist’s feelings about mortality through slouching postures and various shoe-gazing contortions.  However, within this realm there are huge variations.  His works are frequently appended with wings, architectural forms and other objects and, as such, they allow the artist to use the figure as a palimpsest of sorts to express his feelings about religion, history, science fiction, biology other topics.  In Confirmation, for example, where the shape of a gothic cathedral cloaks the head, the metaphor of religion on the brain is obvious; but you’d be hard-pressed to wrest a more specific meaning out of it.  Like the Cycladic figures that they recall, Brady’s forms, with their slit eyes, tiny heads and faces devoid of expression, are inscrutable — they mask all feeling and emotion; yet their brooding countenances point to momentous events that befell the artist.

At age 16 (and again when he was 32), he was immobilized by a form of arthritis that put him in the hospital during his senior year of high school.  It was a period of enforced contemplation, where, as Brady recalls it, “I was trapped in a place where I had a lot of time to think.”  Observers have speculated that the experience influenced the emaciated shape and the inward-looking character that is the reoccurring motif of his oeuvre.  Brady remains wary of such cause-and-effect equations, but agrees that the figures speak “of my own bodily experience and image of myself from a young age.  I can identify with being skinny – really skinny, and there was an aloneness that I felt.” 

All 4 drawings: "Untitled", 2009, mixed media on paper, 14 x 14 inches

 

The unforeseen upside to his illness was being able to substitute a crafts class for an algebra course he couldn’t complete in time for graduation.  “I was given an assignment to make a slab built ‘pitcher’ with no instruction or demonstration; I was only handed a bag of clay and a rolling pin.  Fifty minutes later I had it done and was absolutely in love with clay and the making process.  It spoke to me deeply…I had ability and a good design sense.  With that piece and others to follow I was keenly aware that I owned every part of it…It was mine like nothing had ever been, and it marked the first time I was really good at something.”

Detail: "Confirmation", 1998, mixed media, 87 x 10 x 11 inches

In point of fact, Brady had already proven himself to be adept at a lot of things, particularly earning money.  “The savings, he recalls, “began in kindergarten” with lawn mowing, paper routes and other kid jobs, which were then followed by gardening, painting, furniture moving, grocery checking and restaurant work – all of this before he finished high school.  While his peers were begging their parents to buy things like record players, motorcycles and cars, Brady was paying for them in cash. 

Much later, at Davis, Brady continued to forge his own path. During the mid-1970s when he was earning his MFA, Robert Arneson, the king of California Funk, reigned supreme, shaping a group of artists whose influence persists.  Brady never quite fit in.  “Everything I did harkened to another time, place or layer of history,” he recalls. “I was looking at Eva Hesse, Sol Lewitt and Arte Povera.”  In the studio, he found himself torn between figuration and abstraction, and after graduating he took a camping trip to Pyramid Lake in Nevada.  Out of that trip came a series of composite drawings that set him on his current path, first in clay, then later in wood.  “I seemed to find a way to express the figure in a way that had eluded me until then.  Death, isolation, emptiness, pared down and often attenuated, were the characteristics.  They were the characteristics I liked in the work of primitive cultures and in the art of the untrained, Art Brut.” 

Brady, however, claims no intimate knowledge of the ancient and tribal forms that seem to influence his output; nor does he agree with those who see otherworldly aspects in his work.  What he does acknowledge is that his work is becoming increasingly abstract.  A singular example is Area 51.

Foreground: "Area 51", 2010, mixed media, 113 x 31 x 31 inches

It’s an outsized piece named for the U.S. Air Force base in southern Nevada, long been rumored to be harboring the remains of space aliens and their starships.  With its rocket-shaped, nose-cone of a head set on a platform held aloft by four skinny legs, and with its oval-shaped feet adorned with painted-on polka-dot eyes, Area 51 gives palpable form to the rumors.  (It also brings to mind the illustration for the paperback edition of H.G. Wells’ “War of the Worlds” that so frightened me as a kid.)  

Brady’s drawings are equally revelatory.  Where his 3-D works have a formal weight and a finished presence, his drawings, though heavily worked, feel looser and more spontaneous – like direct pipelines to the artist’s subconscious.  From them, we can glean possible contexts for his solitary figures.  Rarely seen, they show him to be a masterful draftsman and a collagist of a high order.  In these small-scale works, which include hand stitching, Brady creates a colorful, graphic, universe populated by many of the same forms found in his sculptures: tribal masks, glyphs and extraterrestrials – all which, in the drawings, appear against starry desert skies. 

“I love signs, glyphs and symbols for their simplicity abstractness and mystery.  Connecting points in space or architecture has always sparked my interest.  Drawing constellations is a form of connecting points or dots.  I like the shapes and spatial implications that can occur.”  In one untitled drawing, Brady achieved this by tossing handfuls of rice onto a sheet of paper, spray painting it black and then removing the grains to reveal the negative spaces.  The marks that remain closely mimic a clear night sky; their random spacing feels correct, as if the artist had mapped and drawn to scale the distance separating these points of light. 

"Lepus", 2010, mixed media, 84 x 14 x 11 inches.  Photo: Lee Fatheree

Feeding off such experiments, Brady continues to push his three-dimensional works deeper into pure abstraction. In Kinderslam, a wall-mounted array of oval-shaped wooden discs, each element is painted with two black dots that read like dice “eyes”.  Taken as a whole, the piece alludes to cellular activity in a loopy, cartoonish manner, like something Fred Flintstone might have created had he been a biologically minded sculptor of wood rather than a brontosaurus crane operator.

“I don’t often develop an idea linearly,” says Brady.  “Instead, I move in a circle, picking up and discarding and eventually retracing the path of seeing and finding anew.   I am not interested in squeezing all I can from an idea.  I like variety and change.  I will knowingly and unknowingly borrow from any source, even my own history which informs even what may seem new.”  His practice, he maintains, is omnivorous: “I hover, glance and fly by not wanting to know or see too much.  I pluck the savory and put it in my bag, sometimes remembering and sometimes forgetting.” 

The result is that Brady’s art, through all its transmogrifications, remains firmly tied to the iconography he invented; yet at the same time, it is as extensible and as infinite in its potential as the desert itself.

–DAVID M. ROTH

Robert Brady: New Work @ Braunstein/Quay Gallery, December 16 to Jan. 22, 2011.
Reception: Saturday, December 18, 3:00 – 5:00 pm

Read the Robert Brady interview.

Photos: David M. Roth except where noted.

Posted in ProfilesComments (4)

Artist Profile: Michael Stevens

Tags: ,

Artist Profile: Michael Stevens


Dick and Jane

For more than three decades, Michael Stevens has used nostalgic images and icons of American middle-class life from the ‘30s, ‘40s and ‘50s to create theatrical works that blend painting and sculpture to explore the contradictions of our national character. His works, which are on view at Braustein/Quay Gallery, through June 20, combine good and evil and innocence and guilt in equal parts. A subtle and sometimes savage mix of comedy and gravity, they address universal issues that transcend the uniquely American milieu from which they arise.  Few artists manage this feat with as much wit and material invention, and in this show, "One Act Plays", Stevens, 63, is in top form.

Though deeply influenced by the wood sculpture of H.C. Westerman, the surrealists Max Ernst and Rene Magritte, the collage wizard Jess Collins and his college mentor, Tony Berlant*, Stevens is a self-constructed hybrid. “I got my MA in painting,” he points out, so “I’m more about composition than about form and structure. Most sculptors see things in the round. I want to see things the way the audience sees them, as a spectator watching a play or a TV show.”
L to R: After the Hunt in E Minor; Three Wishes
   
Stevens typically sets wood-carved cartoon characters of his own invention against mass-produced landscape paintings culled from thrift shops which he modifies to establish the dramatic (and sometimes searing) counter narratives that have become his trademark. He carves animals and people from pine and applies a high-gloss finish. The paintings, which function as backdrops for the sculptural elements, depict idyllic rural scenes of the sort found in motels and diners, although Stevens occasionally throws in classically themed pictures.
  
In this Howdy Doody-meets-Alfred Hitchcock universe, demons lurk behind white picket fences, and the works carry appropriately ominous titles, like “Cliff Doesn’t Live Here Anymore” and “Snake Bit”. The latter, in which a cat’s curled tail doubles as a noose, can easily be read as a suicidal thought. Others, like “After the Hunt in E Minor”, pull from obscure art-historical references (in this case the 19th century trompe-lóeil painting by William Michael Harnett);while still others remain inscrutable, sometimes even to the artist himself. In the main, though, his mix of middle-brow aesthetics, finely hewed craft and psychological intrigue centers on betrayals, disappointments and various non-specific (and sometimes very specific) threats.
Snake Bit
 
In the show’s signature piece, “Dick and Jane”, we confront two wall-sized cutouts of the familiar school-primer characters. Their silhouettes are rendered as a layered composite of kitschy landscape swatches; they’re the same idealized images seen in the Stevens’ backdrops. Close inspection, however, reveals that the figures are riddled with bullet holes – a reference to Columbine and other school-yard massacres.   
 
This bait-and-switch visual strategy mirrors Stevens’ own loss of innocence. For example, by giving an object a glossy finish, “I set something up to look really attractive. It’s like giving a juicy piece of candy to a kid. Once you draw them in you set the trap. And then, once they get involved and think there’s something there, I want to take it away from them. It seems kind of vindictive. But not everything is polished, not everything is good.” 
The Vicar’s Pup
 In “The Falsetto’s Kitty”, an obvious play on “The Sopranos”, Stevens again conflates opposites by setting a found painting of a thug (or at least a guy who looks like one) against a collection of glass bric-a-brac. This contradiction between monstrosity and domesticity is a consistent theme in Stevens’ uniquely polarized oeuvre, and it often involves animals who appear as silent or bemused witnesses to the foibles of their human masters. “The Vicar’s Pup”, for example, features the cut-out form of a fox terrier set against a bucolic landscape topped by a wooden cross – a reference to the artist’s time in Catholic school, where the harsh discipline imposed by nuns felt like "my first meeting with Darth Vader.”
 
“What I do as an artist,” he explains, “is attach my childhood to my adulthood because there are a lot of things in childhood that you mirror as an adult. For Stevens, who grew up in the‘50s, childhood is inextricably linked to the birth of television. “The cartoon characters, the personalities (like Paul Winchell and Jerry Mahoney) and the commercial icons – they were so high-impact they left a residue on the brain; and the companies merchandized those icons to the point where they became superstars.”   Stevens’ knowledge of early television programming  is encylopedic, and the suburban Sacramento house, which he shares with his wife, the painter Suzanne Adan, reflects that obsession. There are enough toys, lunch pails, Disney characters and period objects to fill a Happy Days museum.
 
When the relative calm of the post-WWII years dissolved into war, riots, and assassinations in the ’60s, Stevens took a dimmer view. He posits Charlie Manson and Donald Duck as examples of the gulf between the decades. “They’re both famous for different reasons, except one of them doesn’t exist and never will. But Donald Duck seems real to many people, and this is why these characters are fascinating. They both exist as part of the make up of American culture, and it’s a culture that is just as capable of giving as it is taking away. 
 
“The ‘60s,” he continues, “showed us who we were as a culture, and we battled ourselves for the first time since the civil war. The anger in my work has always been from that experience, and I always use the images from one generation [the ‘50s] to express the anger I feel in the others.”
Michael Stevens in his Sacramento Studio
 
When building a piece, Stevens does little prior planning. “I’ve been working so long I just trust my own instincts. And I don’t let not knowing prevent me from carving, say, just a head.” Or, starting with just a title. Or, scouring his storage shed for a backdrop that he can use to link disparate ideas.  “Eventually a solution will arise because it always has. It comes in like wind through a window," and it most always reflects his thoughts — about history, TV, current headlines or some personal experience where they all intersect. 
 
“If I’m anything,” Stevens says,  “I’m a satirist. I draw on universal situations, like being out on a limb and using a comedic saw to cut yourself down,” as in “Three Wishes,” where “you have three choices for the place where you will fall. The imagery that I use talks about the human condition, that theatrical predicament that we’re all in.”
 
–David M. Roth
 
Michael Stevens’ “One Act Plays” is on view through June 20 at Braunstein/Quay Gallery, SF.
 
Learn more about Michael Stevens: http://www.michaelstevensartist.com/bio.html
 
 

 

Posted in ProfilesComments (1)

  •