Archive | Profiles

Profile: Peter VandenBerge

Profile: Peter VandenBerge

At CSUS Annex Gallery with "Ace", 2007, ceramic 15" x 32" x 9.5". Photo: David M. Roth

For the past 35 years Peter VandenBerge has been creating outsized ceramic busts whose hand-worked features are as mesmerizing as they are confounding. The mystery of these elongated, primitive faces resides primarily in the slit eyes and oblong noses; but their whimsical ornamentation and outlandish headgear – a distinct brand of ‘60s-era, Duchamp-influenced absurdism – seems to mock their otherwise inward-looking demeanor. This month, seven of his busts will be on display at the Solomon Dubnick Gallery, along with works by his daughter, Camille, 40. An equal number of pieces from the elder VandenBerge, now 74, are also on display in a group show, “Three Friends: Fifty Years”, at the CSUS Annex Gallery through Nov. 13.

One of the sculptor’s most recognizable themes is topping his figures, which often resemble South Sea Islanders, with caricaturized automobiles that look they were pulled from R. Crumb’s Zap Comix.  The obvious metaphor, of “cars on the brain”, is as blatant as those telegraphed by similarly styled heads that in many instances look like they could have been imported from Balinese temples. Those, too, VandenBerge crowns with airplanes, houses, birds, cows, baseballs and other everyday objects – all without allowing the faces to betray the slightest hint of irony, self-consciousness or pastiche. (VandenBerge says he got the idea for topping his sculptures from photographs he’d seen of Madagascar where tribes place various forms atop graves to depict the lives of the deceased.)
"Amsterdame", 2009, ceramic, 43" x 12" x 19"
 
In the mid-1970s, when his career took off, East Coast critics who were unfamiliar (or else hostile) to the comic spirit of the West Coast Funk tradition from which VandenBerg’s ceramics spring, wondered aloud if his work was confused. To that the sculptor asks, “Can’t one be serious and funny?” The obvious answer, given VandenBerge’s stature in the front rank of ceramic sculpture, is “yes”. His work has been exhibited at SF MOMA, the Smithsonian Institute, the Whitney Museum of American Art, the Louvre, and the Shigioki Museum in Japan. None of which does anything to silence the charge that his busts are the visual equivalent of “Have a nice day”. 
 
In some part they may be. Still, you’d be wrong to categorize VandenBerge’s aesthetic as mere folly. His most obvious influences, apart from a childhood spent Holland and in Indonesia, are Modigliani and Giacometti, two artists who exposed the human soul by emaciating figures to such an extreme that the only thing left was bare essence. VandenBerge achieves the same effect through opposite means. Where Giacometti’s sculptures are monumental exercise in subtraction, VandenBerge’s heads are about the piling on of material.  He rolls out clay in long cylindrical ropes, and then builds his figures by coiling the strands vertically to the desired height. The overall shape and specific features are molded by hand, then daubed with earth-toned pigments that, when fired, bear little resemblance to the shiny glazes so often associated with ceramic schlock. Alternately, in an act of self-appropriation (or perhaps simple recycling), VandenBerge has lately been molding clay around existing busts and then peeling it off in slabs to create new heads with completely hollow interiors that bear little or no resemblance to the originals.  His recent homage to his native country, the Netherlands, Amsterdame, with its window-shaped eyes, is a good example.
"Two for the Road", 2009, ceramic, 30" x 16" x 12"
 
Regardless of how they come into being, VandenBerge’s heads always have individual topographies. With chisels, forks, knives and other abrasive tools, he works the surface of his objects in an almost painterly fashion – so much so that one writer actually termed the work “painting in three dimensions.” What’s less apparent to the casual view is the degree to which this work represents a profound transformation of personal tragedy. 
 
Living as a Dutch citizen with his family in Indonesia, where his father worked as a geologist for Shell Oil, VandenBerge, at age seven, traveled to remote regions of the Javanese and Sumatran jungles. While his father scratched the earth for signs of oil, young Peter observed exotic flora and fauna: monkeys, crocodiles, elephants and the like, and people whose countenances were, like those in his sculptures, decidedly non-European. 
 
It was wild stuff for a kid born in The Hague. In a home situated on a mountaintop outside Jakarta, Peter – despite his family’s privileged position – lived pretty much like a native. “I was obsessed with making things out of clay,” he recalls in sipping a cappuccino in a coffeehouse a few blocks from his East Sacramento home. “I was like Pigpen,” the Peanuts character. “My mother and father were always telling me to get out of the mud.” VandenBerge also remembers being entranced by the leather figures Javanese shadow puppeteers used to illustrate epic narratives that held pre-TV-era children transfixed. 
 
In 1942, the same year VandenBerge’s dream began, it ended abruptly. When the Japanese invaded Indonesia (also in search of oil) and herded the population into POW camps, the VandenBergs’ life became a living hell. “The whole goddamn thing was a nightmare,” he recalls. “There was not enough food, there were no sanitary conditions, and people were bashed around; they were dying like flies.” When the war ended in 1945 and Shell evacuated the family to Australia in the wake of Sukarno’s revolt against the Dutch, “we were just about dead; we looked like those guys in Somalia.”
 
Part of the legendary UC Davis TB-9 crew (L to R): Steve Kaltenbach, Ruth Rippon, Robert Arneson, Peter VandenBerge, Gerald Walburg in Sacramento, 1987.  Photo: Tony Novelozo
After a year in Australia and a few years in post-war Holland, VandenBerg’s father moved to California, and Peter, then 19, followed. Twice over the next several years he returned to Europe where he visited Giacometti and Joan Miró. The impressions made on him by both artists were long-lasting, and as a result, he’s continued, throughout his career, to employ the color palettes and gestures of artists who he admires. Two examples in the Solomon Dubnick show are Bonnard at Le Cannef and Jonah Under Surveillance, where the deep grooves of the character’s beard bring to mind Van Gough’s brushstrokes. About a decade ago, I also recall VandenBerge executing a bust that incorporated a credible rendition of De Kooning’s slashing brushstrokes.
 
Backtrack to UC Davis, 1962. There, in the company of virtually every innovator in the then-emerging California Funk movement (Robert Arneson, Roy De Forest and William Wiley), VandenBerge began working, as Arneson’s first graduate student assistant, toward an MA degree. Arneson, of course, was the ringleader of that revolution, and would later gain notoriety for his scathing anti-war statements and his bust of assassinated San Francisco Mayor George Moscone. Arneson’s mission was to take ceramics out of the lowly realm of crafts and inject it into the world of fine art.
 
"Vrouw", 1984, ceramic, 15" x 40" x 19"
It was a period of wild experimentation, of finding out what could and could not be done with clay, and of pushing ideas and techniques beyond previously accepted limits. Fueled by political tensions, loosened sexual mores, ‘60s style surrealism and a distaste for the cold conceptual art then sweeping New York (and a good bit of the Bay Area, too), Northern California Funk artists succeeded briefly in tilting the axis of cultural authority to the West Coast.
 
Arneson was building clay telephones based on human genitalia; Wayne Thiebaud (who opens a show next month at the CSUS Library Gallery) was deep into pop, making pictures of candies, cakes and pies; while VandenBerge, for his part, was casting clay vegetables with crazy anthropomorphic features. But it wasn’t until 1975 that he made the connection with his past that enabled him to forge a signature style. “The linkage between where I came from – the temples where I was growing up and the Indonesian puppet theater – that,” he says emphatically, “was my link.”
 
The result – clay heads that bear a strong resemblance to the much mythologized East Island figures – have been VandenBerge’s trademark ever since. Despite the fact that WWII influenced him deeply, these ethereal (but wry) figures reveal none of the anger and outrage that his immediate contemporaries, Arneson and Wiley, were expressing about America’s involvement in Vietnam. VanderBerge’s highly symbolic figures have always been about primitive man’s collision with modernity, and by extension, his own loss of innocence in the face of forces far beyond his control.
 
If they make you smile, well, VandenBerge doesn’t mind. His main concern in the studio, he says, is the simple “pulling and pushing and punching of clay – the physical act of working it to see what I’m going to come up with next.” 
-DAVID M. ROTH 
 
Peter VandenBerge, The Usual Suspects, at Solomon Dubnick Gallery through Nov. 28, 2009.
 
Cover image: (Detail) Vincent in the Yellow House, 1996, 20" x 36" x 10".  Photo: David M. Roth

 

Posted in Profiles, SculptureComments (0)

Artist Profile: Michael Stevens

Artist Profile: Michael Stevens

Dick and Jane

For more than three decades, Michael Stevens has used nostalgic images and icons of American middle-class life from the ‘30s, ‘40s and ‘50s to create theatrical works that blend painting and sculpture to explore the contradictions of our national character. His works, which are on view at Braustein/Quay Gallery, through June 20, combine good and evil and innocence and guilt in equal parts. A subtle and sometimes savage mix of comedy and gravity, they address universal issues that transcend the uniquely American milieu from which they arise.  Few artists manage this feat with as much wit and material invention, and in this show, "One Act Plays", Stevens, 63, is in top form.

Though deeply influenced by the wood sculpture of H.C. Westerman, the surrealists Max Ernst and Rene Magritte, the collage wizard Jess Collins and his college mentor, Tony Berlant*, Stevens is a self-constructed hybrid. “I got my MA in painting,” he points out, so “I’m more about composition than about form and structure. Most sculptors see things in the round. I want to see things the way the audience sees them, as a spectator watching a play or a TV show.”
L to R: After the Hunt in E Minor; Three Wishes
   
Stevens typically sets wood-carved cartoon characters of his own invention against mass-produced landscape paintings culled from thrift shops which he modifies to establish the dramatic (and sometimes searing) counter narratives that have become his trademark. He carves animals and people from pine and applies a high-gloss finish. The paintings, which function as backdrops for the sculptural elements, depict idyllic rural scenes of the sort found in motels and diners, although Stevens occasionally throws in classically themed pictures.
  
In this Howdy Doody-meets-Alfred Hitchcock universe, demons lurk behind white picket fences, and the works carry appropriately ominous titles, like “Cliff Doesn’t Live Here Anymore” and “Snake Bit”. The latter, in which a cat’s curled tail doubles as a noose, can easily be read as a suicidal thought. Others, like “After the Hunt in E Minor”, pull from obscure art-historical references (in this case the 19th century trompe-lóeil painting by William Michael Harnett);while still others remain inscrutable, sometimes even to the artist himself. In the main, though, his mix of middle-brow aesthetics, finely hewed craft and psychological intrigue centers on betrayals, disappointments and various non-specific (and sometimes very specific) threats.
Snake Bit
 
In the show’s signature piece, “Dick and Jane”, we confront two wall-sized cutouts of the familiar school-primer characters. Their silhouettes are rendered as a layered composite of kitschy landscape swatches; they’re the same idealized images seen in the Stevens’ backdrops. Close inspection, however, reveals that the figures are riddled with bullet holes – a reference to Columbine and other school-yard massacres.   
 
This bait-and-switch visual strategy mirrors Stevens’ own loss of innocence. For example, by giving an object a glossy finish, “I set something up to look really attractive. It’s like giving a juicy piece of candy to a kid. Once you draw them in you set the trap. And then, once they get involved and think there’s something there, I want to take it away from them. It seems kind of vindictive. But not everything is polished, not everything is good.” 
The Vicar’s Pup
 In “The Falsetto’s Kitty”, an obvious play on “The Sopranos”, Stevens again conflates opposites by setting a found painting of a thug (or at least a guy who looks like one) against a collection of glass bric-a-brac. This contradiction between monstrosity and domesticity is a consistent theme in Stevens’ uniquely polarized oeuvre, and it often involves animals who appear as silent or bemused witnesses to the foibles of their human masters. “The Vicar’s Pup”, for example, features the cut-out form of a fox terrier set against a bucolic landscape topped by a wooden cross – a reference to the artist’s time in Catholic school, where the harsh discipline imposed by nuns felt like "my first meeting with Darth Vader.”
 
“What I do as an artist,” he explains, “is attach my childhood to my adulthood because there are a lot of things in childhood that you mirror as an adult. For Stevens, who grew up in the‘50s, childhood is inextricably linked to the birth of television. “The cartoon characters, the personalities (like Paul Winchell and Jerry Mahoney) and the commercial icons – they were so high-impact they left a residue on the brain; and the companies merchandized those icons to the point where they became superstars.”   Stevens’ knowledge of early television programming  is encylopedic, and the suburban Sacramento house, which he shares with his wife, the painter Suzanne Adan, reflects that obsession. There are enough toys, lunch pails, Disney characters and period objects to fill a Happy Days museum.
 
When the relative calm of the post-WWII years dissolved into war, riots, and assassinations in the ’60s, Stevens took a dimmer view. He posits Charlie Manson and Donald Duck as examples of the gulf between the decades. “They’re both famous for different reasons, except one of them doesn’t exist and never will. But Donald Duck seems real to many people, and this is why these characters are fascinating. They both exist as part of the make up of American culture, and it’s a culture that is just as capable of giving as it is taking away. 
 
“The ‘60s,” he continues, “showed us who we were as a culture, and we battled ourselves for the first time since the civil war. The anger in my work has always been from that experience, and I always use the images from one generation [the ‘50s] to express the anger I feel in the others.”
Michael Stevens in his Sacramento Studio
 
When building a piece, Stevens does little prior planning. “I’ve been working so long I just trust my own instincts. And I don’t let not knowing prevent me from carving, say, just a head.” Or, starting with just a title. Or, scouring his storage shed for a backdrop that he can use to link disparate ideas.  “Eventually a solution will arise because it always has. It comes in like wind through a window," and it most always reflects his thoughts — about history, TV, current headlines or some personal experience where they all intersect. 
 
“If I’m anything,” Stevens says,  “I’m a satirist. I draw on universal situations, like being out on a limb and using a comedic saw to cut yourself down,” as in “Three Wishes,” where “you have three choices for the place where you will fall. The imagery that I use talks about the human condition, that theatrical predicament that we’re all in.”
 
–David M. Roth
 
Michael Stevens’ “One Act Plays” is on view through June 20 at Braunstein/Quay Gallery, SF.
 
Learn more about Michael Stevens: http://www.michaelstevensartist.com/bio.html
 
 

 

Posted in ProfilesComments (1)

Artist Profile: Alan Chin

Artist Profile: Alan Chin

Alan Chin
If Alan Chin looks a bit weary, there’s a good reason. In the past 48 hours he’s slept for about three hours, which, as it turns out, is pretty typical for the 22-year-old artist, who when I met him at Sacramento’s Art Foundry Gallery, had just finished a 6-month sprint: making the 50 plus objects that he and a crew of eight friends had finishing installing several nights before, at 3 a.m.
 
Chin’s output, which includes several distinct styles of abstract painting and sculpture (in clay, wood and steel), feels like the work of at least three artists – and, quite possibly, evidence of a bionic level of energy chained to a restless spirit.  At 16 he was the youngest artist ever to be commissioned for the “Hearts of San Francisco” a benefit project for the San Francisco General Hospital Foundation. That was in 2003. Since then he’s shown in France, Italy and the Netherlands and in the Bay Area.   He’ll complete his BFA degree at California College of the Arts (CCA) next year.
 
Journey to Supernova (Orange)
His strongest canvases have a haunted, spectral quality that recalls Helen Frankenthaler’s "pour" paintings; while his large-scale ceramic sculptures, reminiscent of Miro’s, feel totemic and iconic, like relics of a lost civilization. Chin speaks effusively about these influences, while praising the CCA instructors who have mentored him, particularly Raymond Saunders (for whom he works as an assistant) and the ceramic sculptor John Toki. But his biggest influences seem to have come from outside the classroom.
 
The son of two highly successful graphic designers, Chin grew up surrounded by affluence, fine art and plenty of art-making materials, and he credits his parents, who once gave Thiebaud prints to friends as gifts, with helping him develop a keen self-critical sense, particularly in regard to aesthetic choices. “They would tell me, ‘This is a sophisticated color. This is a subtle color. This is a hot color. This is too vibrant to use.’”
 
Installation View
From his grandmother he learned about ancient rituals practiced by monks in northern China which figure prominently in his ceramic sculpture, much as the visual tropes of Louise Bourgeois do in his steel works. 
 
When he was five years old, he watched his home burn to the ground in the Oakland hills fire of 1991, and during the past five years, 24 of his friends and relatives died. “It was a sense of death and loss when I was a child,” an inkling of “wow, this can happen,” he recalls. No surprise, then, that mortality looms large in his art. Chin’s two Bourgeois homages feature spider-shaped, steel armatures under which ceramic figures cower. “I’m trying to convey the emptiness you feel when you know your body’s there, but you feel worthless and empty and totally ripped out and wonder: ‘How am I alive? How am I still functioning?’”
 
Gate of Birth: Cityscape
Chin tries to find out by examining the very essence of life in his paintings.  He made them from photographs of window glass taken with a fluorescent microscope which illuminated the cell structure of water that had crystallized on the surface. He manipulated the pictures on his computer and rendered the results more or less realistically, yielding loose, biomorphic images that look like mash-ups of oil stains and Rorschach blots.  In a similar fashion, his large ceramic sculptures refer directly to trees that burnt on his family’s property. They’re glazed with the same metal alloy of car wheels that melted in the blaze. Chin can also be topical. His “Surveillance” series of ceramic sculptures, which have orifices or eyes, came out of his experience in London, where every street is watched by omnipresent CCTV cameras.  He found Britain’s so-called “surveillance society” unnerving.
 
Chin’s already started a new cycle of work that will see him through graduation. After that, he plans to travel in Asia and Europe.  Sleep?  “Sleep," he says quoting the old African saying, "is the cousin of death.”
 
–David M. Roth
 
 
 
Alan Chin: “A Cycle,” runs through June 6 at the Art Foundry Gallery, Sacramento.
Learn more about Alan Chin: http://www.alanchinart.com/
 

 

Posted in ProfilesComments (0)

Claudia Bernardi @ 40 Acres

Claudia Bernardi @ 40 Acres

When it comes to integrating art and human rights, Berkeley-based printmaker/installation artist Claudia Bernardi has few peers. Tall, lean and striking, Bernardi, 52, speaks poetically and forcefully about how art functions as “an antidote to brutality” and how her art is shaped more by carefully tended process accidents than by conscious intentions. Segura Publishing, the Mesa, Ariz., printmaking facility known for its collaborations with a wide array of blue-chip artists, has represented her since 1995; and this fall, 40 Acres Art Gallery is honoring her with a mid-career retrospective, bringing to Sacramento a body of work that’s been shown widely in one-person exhibits throughout the U.S. and around the world.

Born in Buenos Aires, Bernardi immigrated to the U.S. in 1979 to avoid becoming another “disappeared” intellectual, and after earning MA and MFA degrees at U.C. Berkeley she joined her sister as a member of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Unit. During the early and mid-‘90s, the team exhumed the remains of noncombatant civilians who were murdered during the civil wars that tore apart El Salvador and Guatemala. One of their grisly discoveries in El Salvador was a mass grave containing the bodies of 136 children. It inspired Bernardi’s epic installation Murmullos/Whispers, now on view at 40 Acres.Body Covered with Gazes

Contrary to expectations, Bernardi does not depict the physical pain of death in the point-blank manner of, say, Leon Golub or Nancy Spero—two contemporary chroniclers of war and political oppression. Instead, she emphasizes the persistence of hope among the survivors. Her multilayered monoprints reveal bright, luminous landscapes whose super-saturated colors pull viewers into emotional and psychological states that are more about transcendence than violence. That impression is reinforced by the vitality of the spectral, subterranean figures and objects that populate her pictures at varying depths. Bernardi scratches these elements onto surfaces dominated by searing reds and deep cobalt blues, a mixture that calls up an imaginary collaboration between Mark Rothko and Paul Klee—two artists she cites as influences.

Bernardi’s approach is intuitive and labor-intensive: she applies 50 to 70 layers of pure pigment to wet paper to achieve prints that glow like backlit transparencies. She calls them “frescoes on paper.” “The coloration,” she points out, “oftentimes is a process of subtraction, a scraping away of the layers so that what shows through translucently is in fact the actual mixing of color as the eye perceives it. Sometimes the pigments are hostile and repel each other,” she notes, which occasionally makes it “difficult to work with an idea or subject matter.” Cross Beyond the Red Door

As a result, each print “goes through an incredible transition” in which Bernardi functions more like an attentive observer than an all-powerful auteur. “I am only one part of the process,” she maintains. “The papers have a voice and the pigments have a strong voice, and we work as a team,” she says, likening her role to “a diplomatic act. I cannot take ownership. If the work is good, I am happy, and if it is bad, I am sorry. It’s like a baby; it’s born that way.”

Invariably, Bernardi’s prints do reflect her sentiments about specific events—namely, the last three years she spent teaching art in El Salvador just a few kilometers from where her forensics team exhumed the children’s bodies. Where Bernardi previously thought of art as an interior experience—“a safe place to think about what I cannot think rationally”—she now sees her work in much broader terms, representing “the sense of deep dignity that people can sustain even in times of deep crisis.”

–DAVID M. ROTH

“Claudia Bernardi: Silence Was Hostile and Almost Perfect” closed at 40 Acres Art Galleryin Sacramento Dec. 30, 2007. Claudia Bernardi is represented by Segura Publishing Company, Mesa, Ariz.; (480) 894-0551 or www.segura.com

Posted in ProfilesComments (0)

Profile: Robert Ortbal

Profile: Robert Ortbal

architecture-of-a-scent-ginger-_detail_2008_53-x-55-x-37_wire_aqua-resin_paint_flock_yarn1With the humblest of materials and a truly cosmic vision of how they can be deployed in endless mutations, Emeryville sculptor Robert Ortbal has created a phantasmagorical universe of objects that play on familiar associations while at same time handily defying comparisons to any actual terrestrial, oceanic, microscopic and cosmic life forms you may have known.

 The first time I saw Ortbal’s work in mid-2007 I felt like I’d walked into an octopus’ garden.  Snake-like forms made from styrofoam-covered chicken wire writhed on the walls.  Plastic flowers attached to pink foam tubes mimicked bioluminescent creatures, while a series of wire-mounted Spaldeens seemed to satirize the very act of depicting aquatic plants swaying in the tide.  There were also objects that looked like they’d been cast from endoscopic views of the human body.

Cartographer's Dilemma: Charting a Sneeze (Detail)

Cartographer's Dilemma: Charting a Sneeze (Detail)

In the intervening year, Ortbal’s practice of transforming everyday industrial materials into otherworldly forms has expanded into even more rarified zones, yielding shapes, textures, structures and associations that stretched even the elastic category of biomorphism.

 While Ortbal, 46, readily acknowledges the influence of a long-ago trip to the Great Barrier Reef, he eschews the organic label viewers tend to apply.  “When you’re making hybrid forms it almost always speaks of things from the sea, because when you’re looking at, say, coral, it’s an animal that looks like a plant.  It automatically has that ability to cross over and be slippery in its classification,” Ortbal explains in his sun-drenched studio.  In fact, Ortbal dislikes even calling what he does object building, preferring instead to see his output as “related to a system, part of something much larger.

mistletoe_2008_30-x-27-x-19_wood_soaker-hose_seed-pods_foam_paint

Mistletoe

 ”I’m after essences,” he continues.  “I try to understand patterns in nature and how they combine and interact with human nature.  I’m trying to uncode how those things operate.”

 Ortbal traces the origins of his method to an NEA-funded research project he conducted in Europe in 2001 prior to building an “animated chandelier” that the UC Berkeley Art Museum exhibited in 2004.  In Europe he reexamined Rococo and Art Nouveau and came up with the idea of combining those motifs with “the essences of three distinct kingdoms: animal, vegetable and mineral to fuse this new type of work.”  But an even bigger breakthrough, he maintains, was “three dimensional patterning”- learning to break apart those 2-D motifs and reconstruct them in three dimensions to achieve a “twisting of space.”

Robert Ortbal in the Studio, Emeryville 2008.  Photo: David M. Roth

Robert Ortbal in the Studio, Emeryville 2008. Photo: David M. Roth

 At his most recent solo show (”Neverland”), which closed in October at Traywick Contemporary in Berkeley, Ortbal demonstrated that skill, adding to an already prodigious vocabulary.  Included were mirrored mylar sculptures that used reflected and refracted light as key compositional elements; a diorama-like polar landscape built from carved styrofoam that dangled from the ceiling; and several pieces that activated 3-D space in ways I’d not seen previously.  The most provocative examples came from his “Architecture of a Scent” series – wall-mounted sculptures that attempt to visualize the state of sensory confusion known as synesthesia.

 In these pieces, Ortbal employs what he calls “asymmetrical radial bursts” – flock-sprayed strands of wire that resemble Pick Up Sticks, which contrast hard-edge geometric lines with looping strands of colored wire that take viewers on a ride through multi-planar space.

 Of his attempt to give form to things that can’t be seen, Ortbal says: “It’s interesting to think of making work that is beyond our physical perception.  It frees me up and allows me to push on to a place that’s unfamiliar.” 

 Growing up in the art-poor San Jose suburb of Campbell, Ortbal did exactly that.  “Becoming an artist wasn’t even in the realm of possibility,” he recalls.  But while studying at SF State, he was smitten by the ceramic sculpture of Pete Voulkos, Ortbal saw a career path and went on to earn an MFA at UC Davis.  After a decade of scuffling he landed a full-time teaching position at Sac State three years ago, and has since been rewarded with numerous solo and group shows, a large commission at the Oakland Airport and a Eureka Fellowship.

 ”What I place paramount is my intuition,” Ortbal says.  That modus operandi seems to be serving him well.

Posted in ProfilesComments (0)

Profile: Enrique Chagoya

Profile: Enrique Chagoya

Enrique Chagoya - Photo: Linda Cicero

Enrique Chagoya - Photo: Linda Cicero

From de Tocqueville to Baudrillard, American history is filled with foreigners who have come to these shores to reveal truths that make us squirm.  When painter/satirist Enrique Chagoya burst onto the Bay Area scene in the mid-1980s, his charcoal-and-pastel drawings did exactly that.  Smash-ups of American pop culture and Mesoamerican myth, his art exposed the concealed ideological baggage that culture carries when it crosses national borders.

            Practicing what he calls “reverse anthropology,” Chagoya, 54, redraws Latin American history to show the conquistadores (represented by American cartoon and comic book heroes) being vanquished by the natives.  In this violent, sardonic oeuvre in which the artist upends the modernist practice of appropriating primitive art, Aztec and Mayan warriors and ancient goddesses clash with the likes of Superman and the Lone Ranger, oftentimes at length across multi-panel codex books that fold out, accordion-style, like the original pre-Columbian history texts that the Spanish destroyed.

Cannibal

Cannibal

 To create these highly complex, non-linear narratives, Chagoya operates intuitively.  His studio is filled with books – on ancient and contemporary art, history, religion, politics and comics – as well as masks and objects collected from flea markets.  These he spreads out on a table, selecting combinations that he projects onto paper and then paints or draws, creating from scratch whatever images can’t be gleaned from the material at hand.  His selections, he maintains, aren’t always conscious, but in the end they express a consistent world view.  Namely, that power, regardless of who wields it, perpetuates itself through ideologies that pit competing stereotypes against each other.
Hand of Power

Hand of Power

            While such methods and concerns put Chagoya squarely inside the identity-obsessed, appropriationist milieu of ’80s and ’90s, his work has always seemed to operate outside the high-low fracas. No doubt, that distinction helped Chagoya catch the eye of Neo Expressionist painter Sue Coe who introduced Chagoya to the San Francisco dealer Paule Anglim who in turn helped orchestrate his 1994 exhibition at the M. H. de Young Memorial Museum in San Francisco – a precursor to the current 25-year survey (”Enrique Chagoya: Borderlandia”) mounted in 2007 by the Des Moines Art Center that travels to the Palm Springs Art Museum for three months beginning Sept. 27.  (The show’s three-month run at the U.C. Berkeley Art Museum ended May 18.)

            In the intervening decades, Chagoya has had nearly 40 museum shows in which curators have linked him to the great Mexican muralists (Rivera, Siqueiros and Orozco); the 19th century political cartoonist José Guadalupe Posada; the French caricaturist Daumier; and to the Russian Constructivists who believed as Chagoya does “that art should be seen as life.”  Indeed, in the art verité mode, Chagoya has redrawn Goya’s “Disasters of War” scene-for-scene with contemporary political and religious figures and recast Philip Guston’s “Poor Richard” cycle with a Pinocchio-nosed George W. Bush standing in for Richard Nixon. 

Thesis Antithesis

Thesis Antithesis

            Chagoya’s best-known works – charcoal-and-pastel drawings on paper – are practically iconic in the Bay Area where he has lived and worked since emigrating from his native Mexico City in 1977.  Ronald Reagan and Henry Kissinger as Mouseketeers spreading graffiti from buckets of blood and former Gov. Pete Wilson being consumed by Aztec cannibals were two of his more sensational images.  More recently, he pictured the dramatis personae of the current Bush administration as “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” along with the unlikely triumvirate of Bin Laden, Jesus and Gov. Schwarzenegger dressed as ballerinas -  an undisguised swipe at the governor’s “girlie men” crack. 

            Chagoya draws these large-scale pictures (the biggest are 80″ x 80″) in red, black and white, fully aware of the color scheme’s agit-prop history, as well as its ancient roots in the legend of Quetzalcoatl who, according to Chagoya, transformed himself into a black ant to learn the origin of corn from a kernel-carrying red ant – a symbolic collision of “opposites that interacted to access truth.” Chagoya also makes a frequent practice of creating paintings on canvas collaged with swatches of amate paper – the same fig-leaf bark used by Mesoamerican Indians.

Crossing

Crossing

             Another of his trademarks is his use of stark differences in scale to represent gross imbalances of power.  In “When Paradise Arrived,” the outsized middle finger of Mickey Mouse (inscribed with the words “English Only”) flicks an immigrant child like an insect.  Similarly, “Thesis/Antithesis” shows the hard-shoed, power-suited leg of a corporate type pushing the upended bare foot (presumably that of a dispossessed native) into a sea of blood.   In a typical gesture, Chagoya often adds the imprint of his own hand, in smeared down strokes, indicating what can only be interpreted as a collective last grasp.

            It’s a sensibility “related to death, which is different than here because in Mexico there’s a cultural influence that comes from before pre-Columbian times in which life is a dream and when you die you wake up,” explains Chagoya who lives in San Francisco and teaches art at Stanford.  “It’s a reaction from people to protect themselves against pain.”  The aesthetic translation of that ethos is seen in his penchant for dressing evil in the clothes and poses of comic heroes.  “The devil has a beautiful face, just like in the Bible, so I wanted to look for that face.  I never made a portrait of a politician with sharp teeth.  I wanted to make them clowns, and it turned out to be closer to reality.”

            Goateed, bespectacled and dressed in loose fitting denim with his thinning salt-and-pepper hair pulled straight back, Chagoya looks like a retiring anarchist.  His eyes twinkle when he speaks and he laughs easily, citing art-historical references in a supremely modest manner that betrays none of the anger that underlies his work.

            Before moving to the U.S., Chagoya studied economics and contributed political cartoons to newspapers.  He also participated in the student uprisings of the late ’60s and early ’70s that the Mexican government brutally suppressed.  And though he arrived well-educated and politically savvy, he wasn’t prepared for the race-based identity politics that crisscrossed the U.S. art world.  “In Mexico,” he explains, “we have conflict, but it’s a conflict based on class, not race.  “Here,” he says, speaking of the nationalistic fervor expressed by Bay Area Chicano artists in the ’70s and ’80s, “I felt like I was in a foreign film without subtitles.  Suddenly there’s an ethnic war taking place that I was not aware of.”      

            Unable to express himself through the prism of race, Chagoya turned to headline news, ancient and modern European art sources and to his own newly bifurcated relationship with American pop culture which, as a youth, he consumed voraciously through translated comic books and TV shows like “Gunsmoke.”

            Contrary to the evidence in “Borderlandia,” which seems to indict U.S. foreign policy unequivocally, Chagoya claims his work is “a mirror on humanity” rather than an exercise in finger pointing.  “There is,” he maintains, a measure of “good and evil within every culture” that is accompanied by stereotypes that are designed to propagate ideology.  “All of these stereotypes are created to justify dominance, and that’s what I’m dealing with in my work.  Culture,” he asserts, “becomes an imperialistic force, a colonialist force that replaces somebody else’s culture.

“If you’d been conquered by the Aztecs,” the artist points out, “we’d have pyramids instead of churches.”

###

 

Enrique Chagoya’s 25-year survey, “Enrique Chagoya: Borderlandia,” is at the Palm Springs Art Museum from Sept. 27 to Dec. 28, 2008.  He is represented by Gallery Paule Anglim in San Francisco and the George Adams Gallery in New York.

Posted in ProfilesComments (0)

Profile: Roger Vail

Profile: Roger Vail

Roger Vail - Photo: Jeremy Sykes, SactownFrom its inception in the early 19th century, photography has been about alchemy. Not just the chemical kind that occurs in darkrooms (or today in Photoshop) but the alchemy of the imagination in which ordinary things are transformed. Roger Vail, whose retina-burning photos of neon signs go on view this month at JayJay, is a master of this sort of thing. Since 1970, the year he joined the art faculty at CSUS, Vail has trained the lens of his 8 x 10 view camera on seemingly ordinary subjects to produce images that range from poetically minimal to flat-out hallucinatory.

 His best-known pictures, of carnival rides at night— are blazing wheels of color that look like an artist’s palette run through a spin cycle. “I didn’t know what was going to happen; I just shot it,” Vail says about the earliest of those images, a B&W from 1970. “When I saw the film I just flipped.” That “accident” formed the basis of an oeuvre that would encompass night skies, oil refineries, bridges, marble quarries and rivers. Zipper
In 2006, Vail scored a hit when Life splashed one his carnival pictures on its cover, accompanied by a seven-image spread inside. Bill Shapiro, the magazine’s formermanaging editor, called the pictures “quintessential American iconography. They’re a thrill ride in every sense of the word. They capture the way you remember those hot August nights at the state fair.”
 
Vail’s exposures, which range from several minutes to hours, reveal not only the otherworldly aspects of his subjects, but a variety of spooky artifacts – none of which the artist conceives beforehand. “It’s the forms, colors and textures that catch my eye when I’m working,” says Vail. “Content comes later.”
 
Colin Westerbeck, a former photo curator at the Art Institute of Chicago, likens the “irony and playfulness” of the carnival images to the “out of control” qualities of “a Hitchcock film where it’s dangerous and a little wacky.”
 
His assessment certainly holds for the neon-sign pictures, Vail’s his first departure from film, produced with a digital camera so that he could electronicazlly combine multiple exposures and capture the full tonal range of high-contrast night scenes. Made primarily in Las Vegas, with notable snaps in LA and Sacramento, the pictures use reflected light to pimp-out a limo in flowing zebra stripes; recast a hotel wall as a pigment-laced river; turn a stack of café chairs into a spinning kinetic sculpture; transform the “Viva Las Vegas” sign into a cosmic gyroscope; and pay homage to early influences: Dan Flavin, the minimalist fluorescent light sculptor and Edward Hopper, whose iconic “Nighthawks” painting Vail salutes in “Open Late, a sumptuous photo of an empty café.
 
Martini GlassWhat motivated him to revisit those inflkuences – Flavin in particular – was a display of sign sat the Museum of Neon Art in L.A. After photographing there for “four full days,” he concluded that neon was the only thing other than carnival rides “that would give me a full spetrum of color at night. It became an obvious choice.”
 
Born and educated in Chicago, Vail, 62, is an intense, compact man who speaks with the same forthright conviction seen in his compositions. He credits the city itself and the Art Institute of Chicago, where he earned his BFA and MFA degrees, with forming his aesthetic sensibility.
 
In Chicago, Vail spent a lot of time pouring over images by seminal artists like Walker Evans and Robert Frank – two influences championed by the museum’s then-photo curator, Hugh Evans.  Evans became Vail’s mentor and advocate and placed the young photographer’s works in the museum’s collection, paving the way for acquisitions by others, such as the Museum of Modern Art, the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art and the J. Paul Getty Museum.
 
In 2010, the Pence Gallery in Davis will give Vail a 10-year retrospective in which he will not only show his time-lpase portraits taken at night of carnival rides and neon signs, but perhaps also a new set of portraits. 
 
Rivera Hotel Facade Tree
 
“I’m trying to do to humans what I did to carnival rides,’ Vail says of the work in progress. To underscore that point, Vail reads a quote from sculptor Mark de Survero: “The heart of art is the search for form that is electrifying, that gives life to our vision.”
 
Vail’s work is like a circus mirror – a shadow world in which reflections and refractions transform solids into liquids and gaseous apparitions. It’s not the dictionary definition of alchemy, but close enough.

 

Posted in ProfilesComments (2)

Profile: Roland Reiss

Profile: Roland Reiss

  

roland_reiss_jan_2008__use-thisAbstract painting has had plenty of passionate, articulate champions over the years, but few have exercised as much material inventiveness as Roland Reiss.  In the firmament of LA art, Reiss occupies a unique station – that of cutting-edge artist and academic visionary. 
there_and_here_2004_19x_24_acrylic_on_mylar2

There and Here

   For 30 years beginning in 1971, Reiss led the art department at Claremont Graduate University, taking a fledgling program and transforming it into a creative laboratory, equal in strength and prestige to the best institutions on the West Coast.  He also maintained a highly successful studio career with gallery and museum shows throughout the U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia.  Reiss retired in 2001, but only from academia: that year he launched the Painting’s Edge program at Idyllwild Arts, a two-week forum in the San Jacinto Mountains that painters and critics say is the best idea exchange of its kind.

            In the studio Reiss has always been an explorer, and at 77 his ardor hasn’t cooled.  In his current cycle of abstract, acrylic-on-Mylar paintings (on view most recently at Gallery C in Hermosa Beach), he pulls swaths of brightly colored pigment across his surfaces, leaving see-through spaces that afford views of subsurface layers that function like “movie cartoonist animation cells.”  The most vivid of these, seascapes, read like musical notations; while his landscapes, which include representational elements, employ metallic substrates to activate layers of pictorial space, both real and illusionistic.  All, in their isolation and amplification of specific shapes, colors and forms, evoke a set of atmospherics that practically shout “LA!
Begin at End

Begin at End

“Painting is first and foremost always about light,” Reiss observes in his downtown LA studio. “But the idea that you can refract, reflect, contain and transmit light in new ways, including the exposition of it in colored, transparent volumes or iridescent, pearlescent and interference-colored surfaces of different densities is exciting.”  Reiss speaks fluidly and emphatically in a commanding baritone, projecting the force of an intellect that has always linked media and message.  Semiotics and behavioral research, for example, have been long-term interests.  So when Reiss says “the psychological aspect of visual perception” is what drives him “to intensify the power of abstract form as signifier,” you begin to understand that his paintings aren’t just random collections of environmental artifacts, but explorations of consciousness.   Reiss first attracted international attention with the Plexiglas-encased, diorama-like slices of life he called “miniatures”. Fueled by Umberto Ecco’s writings on semiotics, Robbe-Grillet’s novels and the films of Fellini and Bergman, these quasi-anthropological investigations into conformity, family ritual, consumerism, mobility and corporate culture mixed voyeuristic thrills with biting social commentary.  Critics, curators and collectors embraced them.  But by the time the Barnsdall mounted a 17-year survey of that work in 1991, Reiss “had grown tired of social subject matter and wanted something deeper, more spiritual.”  So he quit sculpture for painting that year and vowed to take the medium “beyond where it has been.”

Floater

Floater

In 2005, after experiments in geometric abstraction and P&D, he succeeded. With a series of wall-mounted Plexiglas boxes coated with clear and colored acrylic gels, Reiss was able to cast shadows on walls in ways that made it impossible to detect the shadow source or the source of the plastic activity occurring inside the pictures without touching the surfaces. The effect was mesmerizing and confounding.  And, so very LA in the way that artifice and illusion combined to form a perception-based aesthetic. 

             ”I live in LA and I think my work is about the experience of LA light,” says Reiss.  “It is about my experience of the world, about how I feel, see and think.”

rogue-wave-2007-19x-24-acrylic-on-mylar2

Rogue Wave

natures_way_2007_10x_12_12_acrylic_on_mylar2

Nature's Way

Posted in ProfilesComments (2)

  •    Subscribe To SquareCylinder Automatic Updates   
  • Follow Me:
    Facebook